The epistemological stance was
Research methodology and reporting expression
Use this phrase to formally explain the philosophical foundation of your research methodology in academic papers.
15秒でわかる
- Explains the philosophy behind how you gathered your research data.
- Used exclusively in high-level academic writing and formal defense.
- Signals deep intellectual rigor and transparency to your audience.
意味
This phrase describes the specific philosophical lens or theory of knowledge a researcher uses to justify their findings. It explains how the author believes we can actually 'know' things about the world.
主な例文
3 / 6Writing a Master's thesis methodology section
The epistemological stance was rooted in interpretivism to capture participant lived experiences.
The research philosophy focused on understanding human experiences rather than just numbers.
Defending a research project to a professor
The epistemological stance was clearly defined to avoid any bias in data analysis.
I chose a specific way of looking at knowledge to keep the results fair.
Texting a fellow PhD student about a difficult paper
I'm at the point where I'm questioning if my epistemological stance was even real or just a fever dream.
I am so tired of writing this philosophy section that it doesn't make sense anymore.
文化的背景
This phrase is a hallmark of the 'Reflexive Turn' in social sciences, where researchers began acknowledging that total objectivity is impossible. It reflects a Western academic value of transparency and logical rigor. Using it correctly signals that you belong to the global community of scholars.
Pair it with an 'ism'
This phrase almost always precedes a word ending in '-ism', like `positivism` or `objectivism`. It’s the ultimate academic 'plug-and-play' sentence.
Don't confuse it with 'Ontology'
Epistemology is how we *know* things. Ontology is what *exists*. If you swap them in a viva, a sharp professor will definitely notice!
15秒でわかる
- Explains the philosophy behind how you gathered your research data.
- Used exclusively in high-level academic writing and formal defense.
- Signals deep intellectual rigor and transparency to your audience.
What It Means
The epistemological stance was is a high-level academic phrase. It tells your reader how you view reality and knowledge. Think of it like choosing a pair of glasses. One pair might show you hard facts and numbers. Another pair might show you human emotions and stories. This phrase introduces which 'glasses' you wore during your research. It is the foundation of any serious academic argument.
How To Use It
You usually follow this phrase with a specific philosophy. Common choices include positivism, interpretivism, or constructivism. You use it in the 'Methodology' section of a paper. It sounds very smart and professional. It shows you didn't just guess your results. It shows you had a clear, logical plan for finding the truth. Use it to bridge your theory and your actual data collection.
When To Use It
Use this when writing a thesis, a dissertation, or a peer-reviewed journal article. It is perfect for the moment you need to defend your logic. If a professor asks, 'Why did you interview people instead of using a survey?', this is your shield. You start your answer with this phrase to sound authoritative. It is the 'gold standard' for academic transparency.
When NOT To Use It
Do not use this at a pub or a casual dinner. Your friends will think you have spent too much time in the library! Avoid it in text messages unless you are joking with fellow PhD students. It is too heavy for a standard business email. If you are just explaining a simple fact, keep it simple. Don't use a sledgehammer to crack a nut.
Cultural Background
This phrase comes from the Greek word 'episteme', meaning knowledge. In Western academia, being 'reflexive'—or explaining your own bias—is a huge deal. It became very popular in the late 20th century. Researchers realized that their own perspective changes their results. Now, stating your stance is a sign of intellectual honesty. It’s like showing the 'source code' of your brain.
Common Variations
You might hear the ontological position was or the theoretical framework utilized. Sometimes people say our epistemological approach. These all live in the same neighborhood of 'big academic words'. If you want to sound slightly less robotic, you can say we adopted an epistemological stance of. However, the original phrase is the classic version for formal reporting.
使い方のコツ
This is a 'C-level' academic marker. It belongs to the 'frozen' or 'formal' register of English. Use it to establish authority in written research reports.
Pair it with an 'ism'
This phrase almost always precedes a word ending in '-ism', like `positivism` or `objectivism`. It’s the ultimate academic 'plug-and-play' sentence.
Don't confuse it with 'Ontology'
Epistemology is how we *know* things. Ontology is what *exists*. If you swap them in a viva, a sharp professor will definitely notice!
The 'Smartest Person' shortcut
In English-speaking universities, using this phrase correctly is like a secret handshake. It instantly signals that you have reached a C1/C2 level of academic fluency.
例文
6The epistemological stance was rooted in interpretivism to capture participant lived experiences.
The research philosophy focused on understanding human experiences rather than just numbers.
This is the standard, most common way to use the phrase in writing.
The epistemological stance was clearly defined to avoid any bias in data analysis.
I chose a specific way of looking at knowledge to keep the results fair.
Shows confidence and preparation during an oral exam.
I'm at the point where I'm questioning if my epistemological stance was even real or just a fever dream.
I am so tired of writing this philosophy section that it doesn't make sense anymore.
Uses a very formal phrase in a casual way for comedic effect.
Initially, the epistemological stance was positivist, but we shifted to a critical perspective.
At first we looked for hard facts, but then we decided to look at social power.
Explains a change in the 'logic' of the project.
If your epistemological stance was actually consistent, you wouldn't be making that argument!
Your logic doesn't match the philosophy you claim to follow.
Used to point out a logical flaw in an opponent's thinking.
The author should clarify if the epistemological stance was objective or subjective.
The writer needs to tell us if they think they are being neutral or not.
A common request in academic feedback.
自分をテスト
Choose the correct word to complete the formal research statement.
The ___ stance was constructivist, acknowledging that reality is socially created.
Epistemological refers to the theory of knowledge, while epidemiological relates to medicine and ephemeral means short-lived.
Identify the most appropriate context for this phrase.
You would most likely find the phrase 'The epistemological stance was...' in a ___.
This is a highly formal academic phrase used for research reporting.
🎉 スコア： /2
ビジュアル学習ツール
Formality of 'The epistemological stance was'
Talking to friends
I think that...
Work emails
My approach was...
Business reports
The methodology adopted was...
Academic Thesis
The epistemological stance was...
Where to use this phrase
Thesis Writing
Defining the research framework.
Journal Submission
Explaining data validity.
Academic Conference
Answering Q&A after a presentation.
Philosophy Seminar
Debating the nature of truth.
よくある質問
10 問It comes from 'epistemology', which is the study of knowledge. It asks questions like 'How do we know what is true?' and 'What counts as evidence?'.
Probably not, unless you work in a highly theoretical field like R&D or high-level consulting. In most offices, it will sound unnecessarily complex; try Our underlying logic was instead.
No, you can say The epistemological stance is if you are describing a current, ongoing project. Use was when reporting on research you have already finished.
In this context, they are interchangeable. The epistemological position was means the exact same thing as The epistemological stance was.
It is pronounced eh-pis-te-muh-LO-ji-kul. The stress is on the 'LO' syllable. Practice saying it slowly—it's a mouthful!
It is used equally in both. Academic English is very globalized, so this phrase works perfectly in London, New York, or Sydney.
Yes, in many modern papers you can say My epistemological stance was.... However, the passive version The epistemological stance was... is safer if you want to remain strictly formal.
The most common mistake is using it without explaining *what* the stance actually was. Don't just say the phrase; follow it with a specific theory like social constructivism.
A 'stance' is like a physical posture. It suggests that the researcher is 'standing' in a specific place to look at the data, which influences what they see.
In a social setting, yes. In a 50,000-word thesis, no—it makes you sound like a professional who knows their theory.
関連フレーズ
Theoretical framework
The structure of concepts and theories that supports your research.
Methodological rigor
The quality of being extremely thorough and accurate in your research methods.
Paradigm shift
A fundamental change in the basic concepts and experimental practices of a scientific discipline.
Empirical evidence
Information acquired by observation or experimentation.
コメント (0)
ログインしてコメント無料で言語学習を始めよう
無料で始める