Effect sizes ranged from
Research methodology and reporting expression
Use this to professionally summarize the spread of your research findings from lowest to highest value.
Em 15 segundos
- Summarizes the lowest and highest results in a research study.
- Used primarily in academic, scientific, or business reporting contexts.
- Connects two data points using the word 'to' for clarity.
Significado
This phrase is used to show the range of results found in a study. It tells you the smallest and largest impacts discovered during your research.
Exemplos-chave
3 de 6Presenting a marketing report
Effect sizes ranged from a 2% increase in clicks to a 15% jump in sales.
Effect sizes ranged from a 2% increase in clicks to a 15% jump in sales.
Writing a psychology thesis
In the three trials, effect sizes ranged from small (d = 0.2) to large (d = 0.8).
In the three trials, effect sizes ranged from small (d = 0.2) to large (d = 0.8).
Discussing a fitness plan with a coach
The effect sizes ranged from 'barely noticeable' to 'I can't walk today'!
The effect sizes ranged from 'barely noticeable' to 'I can't walk today'!
Contexto cultural
This phrase is a cornerstone of modern 'Open Science' movements. It emphasizes reporting the full spectrum of data rather than just 'cherry-picking' the best results. It reflects a shift toward statistical transparency that began in the 1970s.
Pair with 'to'
Always follow 'ranged from' with 'to' to show the upper limit. It creates a clear mental bracket for your reader.
Don't over-complicate
If your results are all the same, don't use this phrase. Only use it when there is a meaningful difference between the low and high points.
Em 15 segundos
- Summarizes the lowest and highest results in a research study.
- Used primarily in academic, scientific, or business reporting contexts.
- Connects two data points using the word 'to' for clarity.
What It Means
Think of this as a way to describe the 'volume' of your results. In research, an effect size tells you how much one thing actually changed another. When you say they ranged from, you are simply drawing a line between the lowest and highest points. It is like telling a friend that the prices at a new mall ranged from five dollars to five hundred dollars. You are giving them the full picture of what to expect.
How To Use It
You usually follow this phrase with two numbers or descriptive categories. Use the word to to connect the two points. For example: Effect sizes ranged from small to moderate. It acts as a summary for a large group of data points. You can use it in written reports or during a presentation. It helps your audience understand the spread of your findings quickly. Don't worry about listing every single result; just give the boundaries.
When To Use It
This is your go-to phrase for academic writing or business analytics. Use it when you are summarizing a meta-analysis or a series of experiments. It is perfect for the 'Results' section of a paper. You can also use it in a professional meeting to discuss project impacts. It makes you sound precise and statistically literate. It shows you have looked at all the data, not just the best parts.
When NOT To Use It
Avoid this phrase at a casual Sunday brunch with friends. Saying The deliciousness of these pancakes ranged from... will make you sound like a robot. Do not use it if you only have one single result to share. It requires a variety of data to make sense. Also, avoid it in high-stakes emotional conversations. It is too clinical and cold for personal heart-to-hearts. Keep it for the lab or the office.
Cultural Background
This phrase comes from the world of evidence-based practice. In the late 20th century, scientists realized that just saying something 'worked' wasn't enough. They needed to measure *how much* it worked. This led to the rise of the effect size. It reflects a Western cultural value for quantifiable data and transparency. It is about being honest about the variability of real-world results.
Common Variations
You might see Effect sizes varied from or The magnitude of effects ranged between. Sometimes people say The impact spanned from. However, Effect sizes ranged from remains the gold standard in academic circles. It is the most recognized way to report these findings. Stick to this version if you want to sound like an expert.
Notas de uso
This is a high-register phrase. It is almost exclusively used in formal writing, presentations, or technical discussions. Avoid using it in casual speech unless you are making a joke about being overly analytical.
Pair with 'to'
Always follow 'ranged from' with 'to' to show the upper limit. It creates a clear mental bracket for your reader.
Don't over-complicate
If your results are all the same, don't use this phrase. Only use it when there is a meaningful difference between the low and high points.
The 'Statistically Significant' Trap
In English-speaking academia, showing the 'range' is often seen as more honest than just saying a result was 'significant'. It shows you value the nuance of the data.
Exemplos
6Effect sizes ranged from a 2% increase in clicks to a 15% jump in sales.
Effect sizes ranged from a 2% increase in clicks to a 15% jump in sales.
Shows the minimum and maximum impact of a campaign.
In the three trials, effect sizes ranged from small (d = 0.2) to large (d = 0.8).
In the three trials, effect sizes ranged from small (d = 0.2) to large (d = 0.8).
Uses standard Cohen's d descriptors for academic clarity.
The effect sizes ranged from 'barely noticeable' to 'I can't walk today'!
The effect sizes ranged from 'barely noticeable' to 'I can't walk today'!
A playful use of technical language in a personal setting.
Just saw the data—effect sizes ranged from 0.1 to 0.5. Not bad!
Just saw the data—effect sizes ranged from 0.1 to 0.5. Not bad!
Quick professional update via text.
Unfortunately, effect sizes ranged from negligible to very weak across all groups.
Unfortunately, effect sizes ranged from negligible to very weak across all groups.
Conveys a sense of professional disappointment through data.
Across the 50 studies reviewed, effect sizes ranged from non-significant to highly robust.
Across the 50 studies reviewed, effect sizes ranged from non-significant to highly robust.
Summarizes a large body of work efficiently.
Teste-se
Choose the correct preposition to complete the range.
The effect sizes ranged ___ 0.15 to 0.75 in the final analysis.
The standard construction is 'ranged from [X] to [Y]'.
Identify the most appropriate context for this phrase.
___ is the best place to use 'Effect sizes ranged from'.
This is a technical phrase used for reporting data and research methodology.
🎉 Pontuação: /2
Recursos visuais
Formality of 'Effect sizes ranged from'
Talking to friends about results
The results were all over the place.
Academic papers and business reports
Effect sizes ranged from 0.3 to 0.9.
Where to use this expression
University Thesis
Reporting your study findings.
Corporate Meeting
Analyzing the impact of a new strategy.
Medical Journal
Comparing drug trial results.
Data Science Blog
Explaining model performance.
Perguntas frequentes
10 perguntasIt is a quantitative measure of the strength of a phenomenon. For example, if a medicine works, the effect size tells you *how much* better people got compared to those who didn't take it.
Yes, you can use descriptive words. You might say they ranged from negligible to substantial if you want to avoid specific statistics.
It depends on the email! In a professional or academic email to a colleague, it is perfect. In an email to your mom, it might be a bit much.
Use from. While ranged between is grammatically possible, ranged from... to... is the standard idiomatic expression in research.
The average is the middle point, but the range shows the extremes. Using ranged from tells the reader about the variety in your data.
Absolutely. It is a universal phrase in the global English-speaking scientific community.
It is better to use the simple past ranged. It sounds more definitive and professional in a report.
You can still use it! It simply defines the two points you found. For example, Effect sizes ranged from 0.2 in the first study to 0.4 in the second.
Not necessarily. It is neutral. The effect sizes could range from poor to terrible—the phrase just describes the spread.
Because it requires an understanding of academic register and specific research terminology that isn't usually taught in basic English courses.
Frases relacionadas
Statistically significant
A result that is unlikely to have occurred by chance.
Standard deviation
A measure of how spread out numbers are in a data set.
Confidence interval
A range of values that is likely to contain the true population parameter.
Meta-analysis
A study that combines the results of multiple scientific studies.
Comentários (0)
Faça Login para ComentarComece a aprender idiomas gratuitamente
Comece Grátis