Peer review comments were

You use this phrase to summarize the results of an evaluation. Usually, you follow it with an adjective or a detailed list. For example, you might say they were constructive or brutal. It acts as a header for a discussion. You can use it in meetings or emails to update your team. It helps you stay objective about criticism. It makes the feedback feel less like a personal attack and more like a professional step.

Use this in any setting involving formal quality control. This includes university settings, scientific research, or high-level corporate reporting. If you just received an email from a journal editor, this is your go-to line. It is perfect for a 'lessons learned' meeting after a project. Use it when you need to justify why you are changing parts of your work. It shows you are listening to the experts.

Do not use this for casual feedback from friends. If your buddy tells you your outfit looks weird, those aren't peer review comments. Avoid it in low-stakes situations like choosing a movie. It sounds too robotic for a coffee date or a family dinner. Also, do not use it if the review wasn't done by 'peers' (people of equal professional standing). If your boss just yells at you, that is 'feedback,' not a peer review.

In Western academia, the peer review process is the 'gold standard.' It is often 'double-blind,' meaning you don't know who reviewed you. This creates a culture of honest, sometimes harsh, critique. There is a famous internet meme about 'Reviewer 2,' who is always the meanest. Using this phrase acknowledges that you have survived this stressful cultural ritual. It is a badge of honor in the scientific community.

You might hear The reviewers noted that or Feedback from the panel suggested. Some people say The peer review was favorable to summarize the whole vibe. If the news was bad, you might hear The comments were extensive. If they were helpful, you say they were insightful. These variations help you control the 'temperature' of the conversation.