Post-hoc tests showed
Research methodology and reporting expression
Literalmente: After-the-fact examinations demonstrated
Use this phrase to introduce specific, detailed comparisons after finding a general significant result in data.
En 15 segundos
- Used to report specific follow-up results in research.
- Indicates a deeper dive into data after initial findings.
- Essential for academic writing and professional data analysis.
Significado
This phrase is used to explain what happened in a deeper follow-up analysis after an initial experiment showed a significant result. It is like saying, 'We found something interesting, so we looked closer to see exactly where the differences were.'
Ejemplos clave
3 de 6Presenting a quarterly business report
Post-hoc tests showed that our social media ads were more effective than email campaigns.
Follow-up analysis proved social media ads performed better than emails.
Writing a university psychology paper
Post-hoc tests showed a significant difference between the control group and the third experimental group.
Later tests found a big difference between the normal group and group three.
Explaining a complex board game strategy to friends
Post-hoc tests showed that my strategy failed because I ignored the resource cards.
Looking back, I realized I lost because I didn't get enough cards.
Contexto cultural
The term 'post-hoc' originates from the Latin 'post hoc ergo propter hoc,' a logical fallacy. However, in modern statistics, it has been reclaimed as a standard term for legitimate follow-up testing after an ANOVA. It represents the shift in Western science toward more granular, transparent data reporting over the last 50 years.
The 'That' Connection
Always follow this phrase with 'that' to make your sentence flow perfectly: 'Post-hoc tests showed THAT...'
Don't Overuse in Conversation
Using this while shopping or at the gym will make you sound like a robot. Stick to 'I found out' or 'It turns out' in those spots.
En 15 segundos
- Used to report specific follow-up results in research.
- Indicates a deeper dive into data after initial findings.
- Essential for academic writing and professional data analysis.
What It Means
Post-hoc tests showed is a heavy-hitter in the world of data and science. The term post-hoc is Latin for 'after this.' In plain English, it means you didn't just guess what would happen. You ran a big test, saw a spark, and then used these specific 'follow-up' tests to find the fire. It is the detective work of the math world. You use it to pinpoint exactly which groups in your study were different from each other.
How To Use It
You usually place this at the start of a sentence in a report or presentation. It acts as a bridge between your general findings and your specific details. Think of it as the 'zoom in' button on a digital map. You first say your overall results were significant. Then, you say, Post-hoc tests showed to reveal the juicy details. It is almost always followed by the word that or a specific comparison. For example, Post-hoc tests showed that Group A outperformed Group B.
When To Use It
Use this when you are wearing your 'serious' hat. It belongs in academic papers, thesis defenses, or high-level business analytics meetings. If you are presenting a marketing report and want to sound like a total pro, this is your phrase. It tells your audience that you didn't just look at the surface. You did the extra work to be precise. It is the gold standard for reporting statistical differences between three or more things.
When NOT To Use It
Do not use this at a casual Sunday brunch. If you tell your friend, Post-hoc tests showed that your pancakes are better than the cafe's, they might think you've spent too much time in the lab. Avoid it in casual texts or when you are just giving a quick opinion. It is too 'heavy' for everyday conversation. Also, don't use it if you only compared two things originally. In that case, you don't need a post-hoc test at all!
Cultural Background
This phrase comes from the rigorous world of Western scientific methodology. It reflects a culture that values evidence, precision, and 'checking your work.' In English-speaking academic circles, using this phrase correctly is like a secret handshake. It shows you understand the 'rules' of logic and data. It has become a staple in the 'Publish or Perish' culture of universities worldwide.
Common Variations
You might see Follow-up analyses revealed or Pairwise comparisons indicated. These are the cousins of our phrase. Some people use Post-hoc analysis suggested if they want to be a bit more cautious. However, Post-hoc tests showed remains the most direct and confident way to state your follow-up findings. It sounds definitive and professional.
Notas de uso
This phrase is strictly for formal, academic, or professional technical writing. Using it in casual speech is often seen as humorous or overly intellectual.
The 'That' Connection
Always follow this phrase with 'that' to make your sentence flow perfectly: 'Post-hoc tests showed THAT...'
Don't Overuse in Conversation
Using this while shopping or at the gym will make you sound like a robot. Stick to 'I found out' or 'It turns out' in those spots.
The Latin Secret
English loves Latin for 'smart' sounding stuff. Using 'post-hoc' instead of 'after-tests' instantly boosts your perceived authority in a meeting.
Ejemplos
6Post-hoc tests showed that our social media ads were more effective than email campaigns.
Follow-up analysis proved social media ads performed better than emails.
Used here to provide specific evidence for a general growth trend.
Post-hoc tests showed a significant difference between the control group and the third experimental group.
Later tests found a big difference between the normal group and group three.
This is the classic academic use of the phrase.
Post-hoc tests showed that my strategy failed because I ignored the resource cards.
Looking back, I realized I lost because I didn't get enough cards.
A slightly nerdy, humorous way to use formal language in a casual setting.
Post-hoc tests showed the bug was actually in the legacy code, not our new update.
We checked further and found the old code was the problem.
Used in a technical work context to clarify a mistake.
Post-hoc tests showed that we were just incompatible on Tuesdays.
Looking back at the data of our relationship, Tuesdays were the problem.
Using hyper-formal language to make light of a sad situation.
While the initial ANOVA was significant, post-hoc tests showed the effect was driven solely by the high-dosage group.
The first test was positive, but the second test showed only the high dose worked.
Demonstrates high-level precision and technical accuracy.
Ponte a prueba
Choose the correct phrase to complete the formal research statement.
The initial results were promising; however, ___ that the effect was only present in younger participants.
In a research context, 'post-hoc tests showed' is the standard way to introduce specific follow-up findings.
Identify the most appropriate context for this phrase.
You would most likely find the phrase 'Post-hoc tests showed' in a ___.
This is a highly formal, technical phrase used almost exclusively in academic and professional reporting.
🎉 Puntuación: /2
Ayudas visuales
Formality Spectrum of Research Reporting
Talking to a friend about what you noticed.
I realized later that...
A standard work update.
Further checks revealed...
A professional presentation.
Follow-up analysis indicated...
Academic paper or statistical report.
Post-hoc tests showed...
Where to use 'Post-hoc tests showed'
University Thesis
Reporting experimental data.
Data Science Job
Analyzing user behavior patterns.
Medical Research
Comparing drug effectiveness.
Business Analytics
Explaining sales fluctuations.
Preguntas frecuentes
10 preguntasIt is Latin for 'after this.' In science, it refers to tests done after you've already seen the initial results of your study.
Yes, absolutely! It sounds very professional when you are explaining data trends, like Post-hoc tests showed our Q3 dip was due to shipping delays.
Usually, yes, because researchers often run multiple comparisons. However, you can say A post-hoc test showed if you only ran one specific check.
Post-hoc tests showed is more specific to statistics. Further analysis is broader and can include non-mathematical checking.
It depends on the recipient. If you are emailing a professor or a data-focused boss, it is perfect. If you are emailing a close work friend, it might be a bit much.
Only if it starts the sentence. Otherwise, keep it lowercase. Some people use a hyphen (post-hoc), while others don't (post hoc). Both are generally accepted.
Yes! It's a great 'power phrase' for anyone who works with data, marketing, or logic-based fields.
Using it when you only compared two groups. Post-hoc tests are specifically for when you have three or more groups and need to see which ones differ.
In the right context (like a report), it sounds precise. In a casual context (like a bar), it might sound a bit 'know-it-all.'
Common verbs include showed, revealed, indicated, and suggested.
Frases relacionadas
Subsequent analysis revealed
A formal way to say 'the next thing we looked at showed...'
Pairwise comparisons indicated
A very technical way to say you compared things two by two.
Upon closer inspection
A less formal way to say you looked at the details and found something.
The data suggests that
A cautious way to report a finding without being 100% definitive.
Comentarios (0)
Inicia Sesión para ComentarEmpieza a aprender idiomas gratis
Empieza Gratis