Attrition was minimal

You use this when discussing groups, studies, or teams. It sounds very professional and data-driven. Instead of saying 'everyone stayed,' use this to sound like an expert. You can use it in a work report or a school project. It focuses on the numbers rather than the emotions of the people. It is perfect for showing that your environment is stable. Use it to impress a boss or a professor.

Use it during a business meeting to discuss staff turnover. It is great for academic writing when reporting on a study. If you are a coach, use it to describe your team roster. It fits perfectly in any situation where you track people over time. Use it when the fact that people stayed is a positive result. It works well in formal emails and performance reviews. You might even use it when talking about a long, difficult wedding weekend!

Do not use this in deeply emotional or personal settings. If your friends leave your party early, don't say attrition was minimal. It sounds too cold and robotic for a social gathering. Avoid it when talking about things that aren't groups of people. You wouldn't say your pizza had minimal attrition just because you ate one slice. Keep it for professional or structured environments. Don't use it if a lot of people actually left.

This phrase has roots in military and corporate history. In the military, attrition often refers to wearing down the enemy. In the modern corporate world, it shifted to mean employees leaving. Western business culture prizes 'retention' as a sign of good leadership. Saying attrition was minimal is a subtle way to brag about being a great leader. It shows you can keep a team together through challenges.

You might hear low attrition rates or minimal turnover. Some people say we saw very little dropout. In casual offices, they might just say nobody quit. However, attrition was minimal remains the gold standard for formal reporting. It sounds objective and precise. It suggests you have analyzed the data carefully.