C1 Expression 격식체 3분 분량

Confounding factors were

Research methodology and reporting expression

직역: Confusing elements were

Use this phrase to professionally list hidden variables that might have influenced your data or results.

15초 만에

  • Identifies hidden variables that influence results.
  • Essential for academic and professional reporting.
  • Shows thoroughness and critical thinking skills.

This phrase is used to point out hidden variables that might have messed up the results of a study or observation. It is like saying, 'Here are the extra things that made our data a bit confusing.'

주요 예문

3 / 6
1

Writing a university research paper

In our analysis of student performance, confounding factors were sleep patterns and diet.

In our analysis of student performance, confounding factors were sleep patterns and diet.

💼
2

Presenting a quarterly sales report

While revenue grew, confounding factors were the recent competitor merger and inflation.

While revenue grew, confounding factors were the recent competitor merger and inflation.

💼
3

Texting a colleague about a weird data glitch

The test failed again. Confounding factors were likely the server lag and the old API.

The test failed again. Confounding factors were likely the server lag and the old API.

😊
🌍

문화적 배경

This phrase is a cornerstone of the 'Scientific Method' which is deeply ingrained in English-speaking academic and professional cultures. It reflects a societal value on skepticism and the rigorous testing of ideas before they are accepted as facts. It became more common in general business parlance as 'Big Data' and analytics became central to corporate decision-making in the 21st century.

💡

Sound like an expert

Use this phrase when you want to gently push back against a simple explanation. It shows you see the 'big picture'.

⚠️

Don't over-nerd

Avoid using this in text messages to your partner about why you forgot the milk. It can come across as cold or dismissive.

15초 만에

  • Identifies hidden variables that influence results.
  • Essential for academic and professional reporting.
  • Shows thoroughness and critical thinking skills.

What It Means

Imagine you are studying if coffee makes people live longer. You find out that coffee drinkers do live longer. But wait! Coffee drinkers also tend to exercise more. That exercise is a confounding factor. It is a hidden variable that confuses the relationship between coffee and long life. When you say Confounding factors were, you are identifying these sneaky troublemakers. You are telling your audience that the situation is more complex than it looks. It is about being honest about what you cannot fully control.

How To Use It

You will usually find this phrase at the start of a list. It acts like a header for your variables. Use it to introduce the things you had to account for in your analysis. For example, Confounding factors were age, income, and location. It is a very structured way to present data. You are essentially saying, 'I thought about the messy parts of this study.' It makes you look like a very thorough researcher. Just make sure you follow the phrase with specific nouns or categories.

When To Use It

This is a heavy-hitter for academic writing and professional reports. Use it when you are presenting a thesis or a business case. It is perfect for a meeting where someone asks, 'But did you consider the weather?' You can respond with, Yes, confounding factors were weather and seasonal trends. It is also great for serious health or science discussions. If you are writing a formal blog post about a complex topic, this phrase adds instant authority. It shows you value accuracy over simple answers.

When NOT To Use It

Do not use this while grabbing a casual burger with friends. If you say, Confounding factors were the traffic and my mood, you will sound like a robot. It is way too stiff for small talk or dating. Avoid it in emotional heart-to-hearts where simple language is better. Also, do not use it if there is only one simple reason for something. It is meant for complex systems with multiple moving parts. Using it for a simple mistake makes you look like you are trying too hard.

Cultural Background

This phrase comes straight from the world of statistics and the scientific method. In Western academia, 'isolating variables' is the gold standard for truth. We are obsessed with finding the exact cause of things. This phrase became popular as data science moved into the mainstream. It reflects a culture that prizes nuance and critical thinking. It is a sign that you are part of the 'evidence-based' crowd. It is a very 'intellectual' way to speak.

Common Variations

You might also hear Potential confounding factors included or We adjusted for confounding factors. Sometimes people just say The confounders were to be brief. In a less formal business setting, you might hear Other variables involved were. However, Confounding factors were remains the most classic and respected version. It is the 'little black dress' of research terminology. It never goes out of style in a lab or a boardroom.

사용 참고사항

This phrase is C1 level because it requires an understanding of academic register. It is almost exclusively formal. Using it correctly signals that you are comfortable with high-level analytical English.

💡

Sound like an expert

Use this phrase when you want to gently push back against a simple explanation. It shows you see the 'big picture'.

⚠️

Don't over-nerd

Avoid using this in text messages to your partner about why you forgot the milk. It can come across as cold or dismissive.

💬

The 'Nuance' Secret

In English-speaking professional cultures, admitting you don't have a simple answer (by using this phrase) is often seen as a sign of high intelligence.

예시

6
#1 Writing a university research paper
💼

In our analysis of student performance, confounding factors were sleep patterns and diet.

In our analysis of student performance, confounding factors were sleep patterns and diet.

Standard academic usage to clarify study limitations.

#2 Presenting a quarterly sales report
💼

While revenue grew, confounding factors were the recent competitor merger and inflation.

While revenue grew, confounding factors were the recent competitor merger and inflation.

Used to explain that growth wasn't just due to internal strategy.

#3 Texting a colleague about a weird data glitch
😊

The test failed again. Confounding factors were likely the server lag and the old API.

The test failed again. Confounding factors were likely the server lag and the old API.

Slightly more relaxed but still technical context.

#4 Joking about a failed diet with a fellow nerd
😄

I didn't lose weight this week; confounding factors were my birthday cake and laziness.

I didn't lose weight this week; confounding factors were my birthday cake and laziness.

Using high-level language for a low-level, funny situation.

#5 Explaining a complex social issue
👔

When looking at urban poverty, confounding factors were historical zoning and school funding.

When looking at urban poverty, confounding factors were historical zoning and school funding.

Used to show the complexity of a serious social topic.

#6 Discussing a relationship breakup seriously
💭

It wasn't just one fight; confounding factors were our different goals and the distance.

It wasn't just one fight; confounding factors were our different goals and the distance.

Adds a layer of analytical distance to an emotional topic.

셀프 테스트

Choose the correct phrase to complete the formal report sentence.

The study showed a link between exercise and mood, but ___ participant age and previous health history.

✓ 정답! ✗ 아쉬워요. 정답: confounding factors were

This is the standard formal expression used in research to introduce variables that might affect the outcome.

Identify the most professional way to introduce variables in a meeting.

We saw a spike in website traffic; however, ___ the new ad campaign and the holiday weekend.

✓ 정답! ✗ 아쉬워요. 정답: confounding factors were

In a business meeting, using 'confounding factors' sounds more analytical and precise than 'the stuff that happened'.

🎉 점수: /2

시각 학습 자료

Formality Spectrum of 'Confounding factors were'

Informal

Talking to a friend about why your cake burnt.

The reasons were...

Neutral

Explaining a mistake to your boss.

Other things involved were...

Formal

Writing a business white paper.

Confounding factors were...

Very Formal

Publishing in a medical journal.

Primary confounding factors were...

Where to use 'Confounding factors were'

Confounding factors were
🧪

Scientific Lab

Discussing why the chemical reaction varied.

📊

Corporate Boardroom

Explaining why the marketing strategy didn't hit targets.

🎓

Academic Lecture

Teaching students about bias in historical records.

🎤

News Interview

An expert explaining complex economic shifts.

자주 묻는 질문

10 질문

It comes from the verb to confound, which means to mix up or confuse. In this context, it means factors that mix up the data so you can't see the true cause.

It is usually too formal for casual talk. However, you can use it jokingly if you want to sound like a 'mad scientist' or a professor.

Usually, yes, because there is rarely just one thing messing up a study. If there is only one, you would say The confounding factor was....

Reasons are direct causes. Confounding factors are hidden or secondary things that make the direct causes hard to measure.

Not at all! It is very common in business, economics, and even high-level sports coaching to explain performance.

Both are correct! Variables is slightly more technical and used in math or hard sciences, while factors is more general.

It is pronounced /kənˈfaʊndɪŋ/. The middle part sounds like the word found.

It is rare. Usually, it is used to introduce a list, so it comes before the nouns.

Yes, it is used globally in English-speaking academic and professional circles, including the UK, US, and Australia.

The biggest mistake is using it for simple excuses. Don't say it if the reason is obvious and singular, like Confounding factors were I was late.

관련 표현

Lurking variables

Hidden factors that are not included in an analysis but affect the result.

Externalities

Side effects or consequences of an industrial or commercial activity.

Intervening variables

Factors that explain the link between two other variables.

Noise in the data

Random errors or variations that make it hard to see a clear pattern.

도움이 되었나요?
아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 번째로 생각을 공유하세요!

무료로 언어 학습 시작하기

무료로 학습 시작